browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

Algae, yeast and bacteria-derived biodiesel great alternative

Posted by on 26 November 2012

Microalgae, yeast and bacterium, oleaginous microbes with which biodiesel can be made. (Photo: Brad Institute/University of Texas at Austin/FIS)


Monday, November 26, 2012, 23:10 (GMT + 9)

Biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) derived from oleaginous microbes—microalgae, yeast and bacteria—can effectively displace both petroleum diesel and biodiesel produced from plant oils, according to the findings of a new study by a team from Utah State University.

The researchers, who reported their results in a paper published in the ACS journal Energy & Fuels, examined the properties, engine performance, and emissions for biodiesel produced from the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis; the yeast Cryptococcus curvatus; and the bacterium Rhodococcus opacus.

“While biodiesel derived from plant seed oils has advantages as a replacement for petroleum diesel, there is strong interest in the potential for biodiesel produced from microbial derived oils because of the potential use of contaminated water, the diversity of oils that can be produced, the use of marginal lands, and the potential for higher oil yields per ac. Three different groups of microbes are known to produce high neutral oils including select microalgae, bacteria, and yeast.

“Here, we have selected a representative from each of these three groups, produced biodiesel, have characterized the properties of the fuels in comparison to biodiesel produced from plant oils. Plant-based oils, commonly used to produce biodiesel (e.g., soybean, canola, and sunflower) are similar to one another in terms of fatty acid composition, containing primarily C16 and C18 fatty acids with varying degrees of unsaturation.

“Each of the microbial sources of oil chosen for this study differ in one way or another from soybean oil, a common feedstock for biodiesel production,” the authors wrote.

The team determined the key physical properties of each biodiesel and compared them with commercial soybean biodiesel. Each fuel was then used to operate a two-cylinder indirect injection diesel engine attached to an eddy current dynamometer.

They found that the selected physical properties of the three microbial fuels were comparable to soybean biodiesel and are within ASTM (ASTM D6751) specification.

In engine testing, diesel #2 delivered the highest power output (8.5 hp) of all fuels. Soybean biodiesel registered a power output of 8.2 hp, 96.5 per cent of the value obtained for diesel #2. Of the microbial fuels tested, bacterial biodiesel had the lowest power output at 7.8 hp, still producing 92 per cent and 95 per cent of the output achieved with diesel #2 and soybean biodiesel, respectively.

Power output for the engine operated with both yeast and microalgae biodiesel was similar for each fuel achieving 93 per cent and 96 per cent of outputs for diesel #2 and soybean biodiesel, respectively.

Hydrocarbon and CO emissions were reduced from diesel #2 levels for all microbial and soybean biodiesel fuels. While NOx emissions are elevated relative to diesel #2 in yeast, bacteria, and soybean biodiesel fuels, microalgae biodiesel fuel generated NOx emissions that were significantly lower, they found.

They suggested that the low prevalence of polyunsaturated fatty acids and the predominance of shorter chain length fatty acids present in C. gracilis oil likely contribute to its low NOx emissions.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *